Wilshaw would like to see the government reintroduce external testing at the end of key stage 1 and at key stage 3.
He said: “Talk to any good headteacher and they will tell you it was a mistake to abolish those tests. If we are serious about raising standards and catching up with the best in the world, we need to know how pupils are doing at seven, 11, 14 and 16.”
Next paragraph:
One suggestion was that pupils should be encouraged to read for pleasure more. The report said some schools were distracted by national tests, which do not always assess pupils’ wider reading skills well.
Recently I’ve been using a lot of Logic Puzzles from the Printable Puzzles website. They’re a really fantastic way to get students thinking, and to get them to use logic. They also help reading two way tables.
You can get the last four days worth of puzzles for free (which is perfect for teachers) and they’re well worth checking out.
I was shown this corker of a graph recently. The scales there are wonderfully deceptive.
I love a good misleading graph. They’re really good for generating discussion, especially when you delve into the difference between a graph merely being wrongly created and a graph that’s been deliberately manipulated to be misleading, as this one has.
I’ve put together a selection of my favourite misleading graphs in this PDF.Obviously you don’t have to use them as worksheet, you can cut them out and use them however you want, or simply display them on the board to talk about.
If you use this resource, let me know how you get on in the comments. I’d love for this resource to generate discussion about how it generated discussion.
Edit : DataBlog Ammp3d (a blog that I will talk about here at some point) posted a funny correction to the Conservative graph on Twitter, which is well worth discussing.
I’ve been a fan of Only Connect for a while, especially it’s connecting wall.
In the connecting wall round you get 16 clues and have to arrange them into four groups of four. You can play the BBC version here.
I’ve wanted to create a maths version for a while, but I’ve never been quite clever enough to do this.
Luckily someone has created a version were users can submit their own walls. It’s at puzzgrid.com. However I didn’t want to clog up the main website, and I wanted all of my grids in one easy to find place, so I emailed the creator of the site Theo to ask for help. This is what he said:
My suggestion is that you submit grids under a name such as #Richard or #MrTock , or whatever. Starting with hash is the key. These won’t be displayed in the main list.
There’s been a lot of fuss about Khan Academy. In 2010, it received over $3.5 million in grants from Google and the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation, and people on Twitter seem to love it.
Khan Academy is pretty amazing and changing education. At least it has for me. Check out the 60 Mins segment: http://t.co/KxIOCs0aN0
Firstly I think Khan Academy and me differ in significantly in our view of what mathematics should be, and they way that it should be taught.
Recently I went to Crytek UK to interview people on how they use maths and why maths is useful (a video of this will be up on the site soon) and one of the interviewees said something really interesting. He talked about how most of the programming is actually fairly simple, and often he refreshes his knowledge of mathematical processes by simply Googling the answer. He told me that what they really needed from graduates, and the skills that were really useful were those of mathematical problem solving. By far the greatest need was people who could see a problem and write that problem in a mathematical context. Most of the best mathematics is not in the doing of the problem, but working out how to phrase the problem in the first place.
Let’s consider these two questions:
Calculate £25 x 22000 and How much revenue do Hull City make each game? One of those is significantly more challenging and much more interesting and open.
Khan Academy focuses almost entirely on the mechanics of mathematics, the skills, and leaves almost no room for creativity, for thinking or for problem solving. Surely these are the very reasons we’re learning the mechanical processes for.
The second issue that I have with Khan Academy is that it’s simply not very engaging, and doesn’t make best use of the environment that it’s in. For instance, watch this video.
The web is an interactive medium. Simply presenting boring old lectures through a computer screen is not good enough. There is real possibility on the web to simulate things. You can take guesses from thousands of people. You can collate data and create rich learning environments with models and interactive software. Simply doing the same thing that put of thousands of students before but on the web isn’t a breakthrough and isn’t real innovation.
As a side note, the interface for writing equations and expressions on the web really needs a think through. Things like the image below are really unhelpful, and I found myself not bothering with the problem, becuase there’s something so unnatural about using a computer with a notepad and pen to do working out (surely using the interactivity of the web we can build in the ‘working out’ tools to enable people not to need a notepad and pen)
My third issue with Khan Academy, and with MOOC (Massive Online Open Courses) is that they neglect the role of the teacher. I strongly believe a good teacher isn’t just there to fill student’s head with knowledge. A good teacher questions. A good teacher challenges and pushes. A good teacher is created by a thousand tiny, human interactions. No online course in the world can substitute for a teacher asking a really probing question or responding to a student with enthusiasm and warmth.
I don’t want to be too harsh on Khan Academy. It’s aims to pass on functional knowledge to people with no access to it otherwise are laudable, and people taking control of their own learning is brilliant. But let’s not pretend that it’s new, or that it’s the future. It’s simply a reissue of an old book with a fancy new cover.
EDIT: This video on Khan at 6:36 terrifies me. A teacher wondering around a near silent classroom.
On of my fields of interest is typefaces. It comes from my dad working as a typesetter when I was a kid, and a general interest in design.
From a young age my dad always drilled into me a hatred of Comic Sans. I think of it in the same way a Liverpool fan would think of Manchester United. However, a lot of teachers use Comic Sans on their worksheets as a way of helping dyslexic learners. I’ve never found solid research to back this up, but the British Dyslexia Association do recommend it and I’m not going to argue with them.
Luckily for me and other Comic Sans haters there’s been a raft of fonts specifically designed to help dyslexic people read over the last few years that are even better.
Dyslexie was probably the first. It has completely different glyphs for each letter, using weighting at the bottom of the letter to avoid the letters being turned around in the readers head. For instance, the p and the d on this page are identical, but rotated. This is not the case with Dyslexie. Problem is, it’s £75 a year to use it. Have a look at the video below which does a good job of describing why Dyslexie is so great.
Don’t worry, though, as there’s a free alternative called Open Dyslexic that uses the same ideas. I’ve used it quite a lot, and it’s often quietly appreciated.
